Home >

news ヘルプ

論文・著書情報


タイトル
和文: 
英文:Improved Forecasting of Extreme Monthly Reservoir Inflow Using an Analogue-Based Forecasting Method: A Case Study of the Sirikit Dam in Thailand 
著者
和文: Somchit AMNATSAN, 吉川沙耶花, 鼎信次郎.  
英文: Somchit AMNATSAN, Sayaka Yoshikawa, Shinjiro Kanae.  
言語 English 
掲載誌/書名
和文: 
英文:water 
巻, 号, ページ Volume 10    Issue 11    1614
出版年月 2018年11月9日 
出版者
和文: 
英文: 
会議名称
和文: 
英文: 
開催地
和文: 
英文: 
公式リンク https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/11/1614
 
DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111614
アブストラクト Reservoir inflow forecasting is crucial for appropriate reservoir management, especially in the flood season. Forecasting for this season must be sufficiently accurate and timely to allow dam managers to release water gradually for flood control in downstream areas. Recently, several models and methodologies have been developed and applied for inflow forecasting, with good results. Nevertheless, most were reported to have weaknesses in capturing the peak flow, especially rare extreme flows. In this study, an analogue-based forecasting method, designated the variation analogue method (VAM), was developed to overcome this weakness. This method, the wavelet artificial neural network (WANN) model, and the weighted mean analogue method (WMAM) were used to forecast the monthly reservoir inflow of the Sirikit Dam, located in the Nan River Basin, one of the eight sub-basins of the Chao Phraya River Basin in Thailand. It is one of four major dams in the Chao Phraya Basin, with a maximum storage of 10.64 km3, which supplies water to 22 provinces in this basin, covering an irrigation area of 1,513,465 hectares. Due to the huge extreme monthly inflow in August, with inflow of more than 3 km3 in 1985 and 2011, monthly or longer lead time inflow forecasting is needed for proper water and flood control management of this dam. The results of forecasting indicate that the WANN model provided good forecasting for whole-year forecasting including both low-flow and high-flow patterns, while the WMAM model provided only satisfactory results. The VAM showed the best forecasting performance and captured the extreme inflow of the Sirikit Dam well. For the high-flow period (July–September), the WANN model provided only satisfactory results, while those of the WMAM were markedly poorer than for the whole year. The VAM showed the best capture of flow in this period, especially for extreme flow conditions that the WANN and WMAM models could not capture.

©2007 Tokyo Institute of Technology All rights reserved.